1 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
> |
4 |
> Mark Knecht wrote: |
5 |
> | On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Dan Farrell <dan@×××××××××.cx> wrote: |
6 |
> | |
7 |
> | It's an interesting question and one I've not tried to test. Does an |
8 |
> | AMD64 machine running a 32-bit or 64-bit install run faster or slower |
9 |
> | with one or the other. For all of my everyday work - Gnome, Firefox, |
10 |
> | web browsing, email, MythTV, etc., it's been my assumption that there |
11 |
> | wouldn't be any noticeble difference. I run 64-bit but assume I'd run |
12 |
> | at more or less the same speed if I ran 32-bit. I may be wrong. Anyone |
13 |
> | have any measured data? Same machine, two installs? |
14 |
> |
15 |
> I have a few numbers from genlop -t |
16 |
> |
17 |
> *32-bit* |
18 |
> |
19 |
> ~ * www-client/mozilla-firefox |
20 |
> ~ Sat Dec 29 00:35:39 2007 >>> www-client/mozilla-firefox-2.0.0.11 |
21 |
> ~ merge time: 11 minutes and 30 seconds. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> ~ Sat Feb 9 12:43:52 2008 >>> www-client/mozilla-firefox-2.0.0.12 |
24 |
> ~ merge time: 10 minutes and 44 seconds. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> ~ * mail-client/mozilla-thunderbird |
27 |
> ~ Sat Aug 4 13:25:28 2007 >>> mail-client/mozilla-thunderbird-2.0.0.6 |
28 |
> ~ merge time: 18 minutes and 49 seconds. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> ~ Fri Nov 23 12:57:01 2007 >>> mail-client/mozilla-thunderbird-2.0.0.9 |
31 |
> ~ merge time: 10 minutes and 37 seconds. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> ~ * kde-base/kdelibs |
34 |
> ~ Sat Dec 29 09:31:18 2007 >>> kde-base/kdelibs-3.5.7-r3 |
35 |
> ~ merge time: 18 minutes and 56 seconds. |
36 |
> |
37 |
> ~ Sat Dec 29 11:07:40 2007 >>> kde-base/kdelibs-3.5.7-r3 |
38 |
> ~ merge time: 19 minutes and 37 seconds. |
39 |
> |
40 |
> ~ Wed Jan 30 20:38:52 2008 >>> kde-base/kdelibs-3.5.8-r3 |
41 |
> ~ merge time: 18 minutes and 19 seconds. |
42 |
> |
43 |
> ~ Tue Feb 26 20:16:28 2008 >>> kde-base/kdelibs-3.5.8-r3 |
44 |
> ~ merge time: 21 minutes and 38 seconds. |
45 |
> |
46 |
> * app-office/openoffice |
47 |
> ~ Fri Nov 23 19:14:12 2007 >>> app-office/openoffice-2.3.0 |
48 |
> ~ merge time: 1 hour and 48 seconds. |
49 |
> |
50 |
> ~ Sat Dec 29 01:35:35 2007 >>> app-office/openoffice-2.3.1 |
51 |
> ~ merge time: 59 minutes and 56 seconds. |
52 |
> |
53 |
> ~ Tue Feb 5 11:51:26 2008 >>> app-office/openoffice-2.3.1-r1 |
54 |
> ~ merge time: 1 hour, 4 minutes and 28 seconds. |
55 |
> |
56 |
> |
57 |
> *64-bit* |
58 |
> |
59 |
> * www-client/mozilla-firefox |
60 |
> ~ Tue Jan 1 14:14:50 2008 >>> www-client/mozilla-firefox-2.0.0.11 |
61 |
> ~ merge time: 8 minutes and 43 seconds. |
62 |
> |
63 |
> ~ Wed Feb 20 21:39:03 2008 >>> www-client/mozilla-firefox-2.0.0.12 |
64 |
> ~ merge time: 8 minutes and 39 seconds. |
65 |
> |
66 |
> * mail-client/mozilla-thunderbird |
67 |
> ~ Tue Jan 1 14:25:01 2008 >>> mail-client/mozilla-thunderbird-2.0.0.9 |
68 |
> ~ merge time: 9 minutes and 9 seconds. |
69 |
> |
70 |
> ~ Sun Mar 9 01:22:43 2008 >>> mail-client/mozilla-thunderbird-2.0.0.12 |
71 |
> ~ merge time: 8 minutes and 2 seconds. |
72 |
> |
73 |
> * kde-base/kdelibs |
74 |
> ~ Tue Jan 1 11:04:37 2008 >>> kde-base/kdelibs-3.5.7-r3 |
75 |
> ~ merge time: 16 minutes and 47 seconds. |
76 |
> |
77 |
> ~ Wed Feb 20 22:01:22 2008 >>> kde-base/kdelibs-3.5.8-r3 |
78 |
> ~ merge time: 18 minutes and 12 seconds. |
79 |
> |
80 |
> * app-office/openoffice |
81 |
> ~ Fri Mar 14 21:23:57 2008 >>> app-office/openoffice-2.3.1-r1 |
82 |
> ~ merge time: 48 minutes and 45 seconds. |
83 |
> |
84 |
> These times are from the same machine: |
85 |
> abit ip35 pro, c2quad q6600 (2.4ghz), 4gb ram, (320+320) sataII raid0 (155-MB/s) |
86 |
> |
87 |
> - -- |
88 |
> Filipe Sousa |
89 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
90 |
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) |
91 |
> |
92 |
> iD8DBQFH2wABbQdNYqwwwCwRAvWsAKCSjwXXHIT2agHd7Hh+7ZwaTOzQeQCdG1Ctol |
93 |
> M29wU4QkWfsgkRO1jgipuKw= |
94 |
> =5cd |
95 |
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
96 |
|
97 |
|
98 |
My advice is not to use it yet. I thought 64-bit computers could bring |
99 |
in a whole new dimension into the computing world. going from 16 to 32 |
100 |
bits was a significant improvement in terms of applications and what you |
101 |
can do at a given time. You can see the big difference in Operating |
102 |
systems and programs of various application going from 16 to 32. This |
103 |
64-bit and even dual-core thing has still to bear fruit -- at least for |
104 |
me. It's not faster by any noticeable difference and most applications |
105 |
are not optimized for it. I won't switch until I know I can gain a major |
106 |
advantage utilizing this technology.I have 2gigs of ram and still have |
107 |
yet to use more than 200M at anytime. So, why do I need 8 gigs of memory |
108 |
or more. |
109 |
|
110 |
-- |
111 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |