Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@×××××××××××××××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gcc-6.4.0-r1::gentoo failed (compile phase)
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 22:09:36
Message-Id: 06d1a56e-ca72-cbd9-3ea4-bdd7d80c0685@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: gcc-6.4.0-r1::gentoo failed (compile phase) by Ian Zimmerman
1 On 03/28/2018 03:53 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
2 > Well, that's too many 3-letter acronyms for me It is lower level, yes.
3 > All the filesystem code is on the client; the server only handles requests
4 > of the form "here's the new contents of block 1234, and be sure to tell
5 > me when it's safely on disk".
6
7 Fair enough.
8
9 The point being, NBD / AoE / iSCSI are SAN technologies and not
10 conducive for multiple clients to access at the same time (without a
11 clustered file system). Unlike NFS which is safe for multiple clients
12 to access at the same time. So, having multiple distributed build
13 machines sort of necessitates NFS (or a clustered file system).
14
15
16
17 --
18 Grant. . . .
19 unix || die

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-user] Re: gcc-6.4.0-r1::gentoo failed (compile phase) Ian Zimmerman <itz@××××××××××××.org>