| 1 |
Am Samstag, 6. Oktober 2012, 16:43:20 schrieb Dale: |
| 2 |
> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Am Samstag, 6. Oktober 2012, 07:32:52 schrieb Dale: |
| 4 |
> >> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
| 5 |
> >>> Am Samstag, 6. Oktober 2012, 10:24:16 schrieb Alain Didierjean: |
| 6 |
> >>>> Gigabyte 990DX |
| 7 |
> >>> |
| 8 |
> >>> from some experience I and a couple and friends had: you never go wrong |
| 9 |
> >>> buying Gigabyte. |
| 10 |
> >> |
| 11 |
> >> +1 Right now, Gigabyte has the good mobos. That may change later on |
| 12 |
> >> but . . . I remember when Abit was awesome to. My old rig has a Abit |
| 13 |
> >> NF7. I wonder what will come after Gigabyte? |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > I am not looking for 'awesome' but 'rock solid' and 'stable'. For some |
| 16 |
> > time |
| 17 |
> > Asrock filled that niche nicely. But Gigabyte passed them. I do not care |
| 18 |
> > about 1 or 5% performance differences. I care about stability. Gigabyte |
| 19 |
> > delivers. |
| 20 |
> Well, that was what I was talking about. If I had a mobo that was |
| 21 |
> flakey or doing something weird, would I say that it is awesome? |
| 22 |
> Certainly not. My old Abit mobo is still rock solid. I don't run it |
| 23 |
> much anymore but it still works fine even tho it is 9 years old. I have |
| 24 |
> had my current Gigabyte for a couple years I guess and it is rock solid |
| 25 |
> too. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> That is awesome to me. ;-) |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
well, there are people who think 'wins in a lot of benchmarks' or 'lots of |
| 30 |
features' or 'overclockers choice' means awesome. Good to know that you do |
| 31 |
belong to the intelligent part of the population. |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> Dale |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> :-) :-) |
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
#163933 |
Archives