1 |
Andrew Savchenko <bircoph <at> gentoo.org> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
> > > 3. Performance. This is natural to strive to get full speed |
5 |
> > https://bcache.evilpiepirate.org/ |
6 |
|
7 |
> While bcache is a great technology, this is not what I need here. |
8 |
> On this box NVMe will be the only storage and / will be placed |
9 |
> there. All other data will be NFS-accessible over 1 Gbps link. |
10 |
|
11 |
Yep, I hear about how wonderful it is from many performance oriented folks. |
12 |
NVMe is certainly a positive development for SSD. |
13 |
|
14 |
> I have thoughts about caching NFS using filescached, but limited |
15 |
> durability of the drive (400 TBW warranty for 512 GB size) restrains |
16 |
> me here. Probably I'll use it for caching only in exceptional cases |
17 |
> (e.g. slow remote mounts like AFS), but with 64 GB RAM I doubt I'll |
18 |
> need additional NVMe-based caching, at least for now, with time |
19 |
> this may change of course. |
20 |
|
21 |
Well, to be truthful, I was hoping your application was a speed boost |
22 |
for clusters. Particularly a gentoo based cluster with some NVMe boards |
23 |
on workstations that lend their excess power to a local cluster. Lots of |
24 |
folks are building in house clusters where technical users have monster |
25 |
workstations and use those excess workstation resources to boost the local |
26 |
cluster. That's kinda my twist (lxqt on the desktop) for single (big |
27 |
problem/data) on gentoo with mesos clusters. Do drop me a line, should that |
28 |
type of usage permeate your thought_cycles..... |
29 |
|
30 |
> Best regards, |
31 |
> Andrew Savchenko |
32 |
|
33 |
arigatou, |
34 |
James |