| 1 |
On Fri, 2 Dec 2011 22:00:18 +0000, David W Noon wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > Now it makes sense, but can't you use busybox fsck? |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> AFAIAA, busybox does not have an fsck command. If it did, it would |
| 6 |
> only be a transparent loader for filesystem-specific programs, such as |
| 7 |
> e2fsck or reiserfsck; this is how the standard fsck program works too. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Busybox does have an fsck, it doesn't recognise the filesystem type, you |
| 10 |
have to give it as an argument. A quick Google suggest that it does |
| 11 |
indeed pass the work on to e2fsck, however, I tried renaming /sbin/e2fsck |
| 12 |
and then running "busybox fsck -t ext2 /dev/summat" and it worked. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Copy from another: plagiarism. Copy from many: research. |
Archives