| 1 |
haha, some one has found that my english is not very good. sorry, i |
| 2 |
made the sentence too short, and did not made myself clear. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
of course i know the PV thing about xen. but for many people who want |
| 5 |
to use virtualization on linux, they want to run windows on it too, |
| 6 |
especially for linux desktop usage. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
yes, kvm is very fast and small. but i still choose vmware, because my |
| 9 |
old machine does not support VT. ;( |
| 10 |
if you have a old machine, and you want to run windows on it, i think |
| 11 |
linux+vmware-server is really a good solution. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Alan McKinnon<alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 15 |
> On Saturday 05 September 2009 07:58:22 Xi Shen wrote: |
| 16 |
>> xen requires your cpu support hardware virtulization. and i only heard |
| 17 |
>> it support windows, but i do not know how well it supports. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> This is utterly and completely wrong on so many levels it doesn't deserve an |
| 20 |
> explanation. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Just forget you ever heard that statement. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> -- |
| 25 |
> alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Best Regards, |
| 33 |
David Shen |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
http://twitter.com/davidshen84 |
Archives