| 1 |
Darren Kirby <bulliver@×××××××××××.org>: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Quoth the Alexander Skwar |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> Darren, on the other hand, seems to have |
| 6 |
>> some misunderstanding about how portage works. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Stop being so bloody obtuse and read my response to Willie. I know perfectly |
| 9 |
> well how portage works. I am taking issues with your vague responses which |
| 10 |
> are open to several interpretations. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
No, they are not. I said, that it is unreasonable to expect, that |
| 13 |
emerge should offer a version other than 0.8 of dir2ogg, as that's |
| 14 |
the latest stable. Or rather, I asked maxim why he thinks, that |
| 15 |
a version, other than the latest stable (ie. 0.8), should be |
| 16 |
offered. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> You would be well served by writing a clear and concise response |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I did. If you try to interprete it somehow and you get it wrong, |
| 21 |
than I'm terribly sorry for that, but that's just not my problem. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> rather than |
| 24 |
> another open-ended question if you want to get your point accross. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
My point is, that emerge offers, by default, to install the latest |
| 27 |
stable version. I wanted to make maxim think about why he expects |
| 28 |
a different version. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
>> Just because there's |
| 31 |
>> a newer version of some program out there in the wild, doesn't mean, |
| 32 |
>> that it'll be available to emerge/portage through some sort of magic. |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> That's certainly not what I think, |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
I didn't say so, did I? |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
Alexander Skwar |
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
<rcw> those apparently-bacteria-like multicolor worms coming out of |
| 42 |
microsoft's backorifice |
| 43 |
<rcw> that's the backoffice logo |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
-- |
| 47 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives