| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 15/09/15 05:26, siefke_listen@×××.de wrote: |
| 5 |
> Yes, i use slim. Yesterday come update without consolekit. But i |
| 6 |
> understand not the bug problem. They write i should set |
| 7 |
> "x11-misc/slim -consolekit" > |
| 8 |
> /etc/portage/profiles/package.use.mask but what should help? Slim |
| 9 |
> not will compile with consolekit and so the problem is same. Or |
| 10 |
> have something what understand? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I believe you are correct that this is an artifact of bug 560088 [1]. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
The problem was that slim was breaking in some cases and failing to |
| 15 |
log in, but not in other cases. The workaround for this - masking the |
| 16 |
slim[consolekit] USE flag, fixed the problem but also caused other |
| 17 |
DE's to not be able to handle power management because the login |
| 18 |
manager didn't have consolekit support. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
A new version of the x11-misc/slim ebuild was pushed to the tree with |
| 21 |
a potential fix for this (and with the USE mask removed), so you |
| 22 |
should be able to remove the unmask you put in and rebuild |
| 23 |
slim-1.3.6-r5 to resolve this. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
1: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=560088 |
| 26 |
- -- |
| 27 |
wraeth <wraeth@×××××××××.au> |
| 28 |
GnuPG Key: B2D9F759 |
| 29 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 30 |
Version: GnuPG v2 |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAlX3VOsACgkQXcRKerLZ91lTgAD9H5dM1n+9dAAbr/75aSsvDQfp |
| 33 |
bVeZctMNfTAzDIInK0UA/AvYQBztZxbxHmb5EFIivVTi8lBvrlp1bX8I9lAwrZQw |
| 34 |
=DcsJ |
| 35 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives