Archives
Archives
| From: | Grant Taylor <gtaylor@×××××××××××××××××××××.net> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] What do you think about pam-gnupg? | ||
| Date: | Thu, 02 Mar 2023 17:20:19 | ||
| Message-Id: | f91f6bae-4b07-fe12-62d1-960e19ce7d87@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] What do you think about pam-gnupg? by Matt Connell |
||
| 1 | On 3/2/23 6:48 AM, Matt Connell wrote: |
| 2 | > You just described gpg-agent, the core of what Efe (OP) is meddling |
| 3 | > with :) |
| 4 | |
| 5 | No, I didn't. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | I was referring to having the OP's utility read the password and |
| 8 | interact with GPG /once/ at startup and then the utility run for a much |
| 9 | longer time retaining the decrypted password in it's memory. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | The difference may seem subtle, but it is very important to understand. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | -- |
| 16 | Grant. . . . |
| 17 | unix || die |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] What do you think about pam-gnupg? | efeizbudak <efeizbudak@×××××××.org> |