| 1 |
Pandu Poluan wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> On Oct 25, 2012 10:08 AM, "Michael Mol" <mikemol@×××××.com |
| 5 |
> <mailto:mikemol@×××××.com>> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > http://lwn.net/Articles/521022/ |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > Links to relevant analysis. Useful comments. 'nuff said. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > -- |
| 13 |
> > :wq |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Nice find, thanks. But the update to that article which gave a link to |
| 16 |
> Theo T'so email is quite unnerving. He said that his initial |
| 17 |
> hypothesis had not been proven and he himself is back in the dark. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Not much confidence in ext4 for the time being for me. Back to |
| 20 |
> reiserfs? ;-) |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Rgds, |
| 23 |
> -- |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Or just don't update the kernel until it is fixed. After all, if the |
| 28 |
kernel you are using works and is not a serious security problem, just |
| 29 |
use it for a while. They will fix it pretty soon I'm sure. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Dale |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
:-) :-) |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |
Archives