1 |
It would be far better to use Spinrite (like I mentioned before) - to allow |
2 |
a really low level access to the drive. While Spinrite is running the HDD |
3 |
will not be able to automatically relocate sectors. I've been blown away |
4 |
how effective this piece of software is - even when run with (apparently) |
5 |
very knackered Maxtor drives!! It was like they were brought back from the |
6 |
dead... |
7 |
|
8 |
|
9 |
|
10 |
|
11 |
On 25 January 2015 at 13:41, Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
12 |
|
13 |
> On Saturday 24 Jan 2015 18:18:36 Dale wrote: |
14 |
> |
15 |
> > Since I already replaced this drive, nothing lost. We did learn |
16 |
> > something tho. Just because it claims to have fixed itself doesn't mean |
17 |
> > it will be a long term solution. ;-) |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> > Dale |
20 |
> > |
21 |
> > :-) :-) |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Your repeated dd action probably relocated some bad blocks. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> I would also run a long test overnight to see where and how it fails. I |
26 |
> recently had a drive which went sideways on me. Running dd was successful |
27 |
> in |
28 |
> relocating some problematic sectors. However, repeating the smart tests |
29 |
> revealed that more and more sectors were going bad. I recall a warning |
30 |
> that a |
31 |
> catastrophic drive failure was imminent, when reading the output of |
32 |
> 'smartctl |
33 |
> -a'. |
34 |
> |
35 |
> Instead of dd'ing the whole drive, just dd the suspect sector and repeat |
36 |
> the |
37 |
> smart tests to see how things move around. I concur with other posters |
38 |
> that |
39 |
> this drive should only be used for experimentation, rather than production |
40 |
> or |
41 |
> back ups. |
42 |
> |
43 |
> -- |
44 |
> Regards, |
45 |
> Mick |
46 |
> |
47 |
|
48 |
|
49 |
|
50 |
-- |
51 |
|
52 |
All the best, |
53 |
Robert |