| 1 |
On Saturday 11 Apr 2015 00:08:23 Peter Humphrey wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Back to the original theme, I'd been experimenting with -j and -l make |
| 4 |
> options, and I suspect that was my real problem. I finished up with "-j |
| 5 |
> -l20" on this i5 box, with startling results - 56 emerges in parallel for |
| 6 |
> instance. I suspect that my problem stemmed from this. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> All now seems stable so far with -j12 and no -l specified. Satisfactory CPU |
| 9 |
> utilisation and the all-important stability. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> So no, perl isn't broken :) |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
On an early generation mobile i7 I have MAKEOPTS="-j5 -l12.8" with no |
| 14 |
noticeable adverse effects, although on recent mammoth emerges the |
| 15 |
responsiveness goes down when swap is used. I can't even recall how I arrived |
| 16 |
at these settings. |
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Regards, |
| 19 |
Mick |
Archives