1 |
On Sat, 27 May 2006 07:54:44 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> > and KDE continued to |
4 |
> > work. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Not here. |
7 |
|
8 |
I've had a few strange errors since posting that. Like one from Konqueror |
9 |
when trying to load a page, which then loaded perfectly on the next try. |
10 |
|
11 |
> > Maybe i've not run one of the affected programs. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> > Re-emerging |
14 |
> > *everything* to fix a KDE problem seems like knee-jerk overkill. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Well, but that's what's suggested. |
17 |
|
18 |
I think I'll pass on that one. Rebuilding all of KDE will take long |
19 |
enough, but it seems prudent, I'm certainly not going to spend 16+ hours |
20 |
rebuilding OOo if I don't need to. |
21 |
|
22 |
> Anyway, it's plain wrong that NOTHING has to be done after upgrading |
23 |
> to gcc 4.1.1. Maybe an "emerge -e world" is required. And an "emerge |
24 |
> -e world" is *very* *much* from doing nothing... |
25 |
|
26 |
Absolutely. The GWN posting was clearly optimistic :( |
27 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
Neil Bothwick |
31 |
|
32 |
This man is depriving a village somewhere of an idiot |