| 1 |
On Samstag 31 Juli 2010, Kacper Kopczyński wrote: |
| 2 |
> Dnia 2010-07-31, o godz. 16:15:51 |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> napisał(a): |
| 5 |
> > On Samstag 31 Juli 2010, Kacper Kopczyński wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > Hi, |
| 7 |
> > > |
| 8 |
> > > My problem is really strange - I can't access my hard drive from |
| 9 |
> > > linux, but it works from windows without problems. It has some bad |
| 10 |
> > > blocks. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > it has a lot of bad blocks and a fucked up firmware it seems. No way |
| 13 |
> > it is working 'without problems'. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Well total space taken by bad blocks according to chkdsk is less than |
| 16 |
> 1MB, |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
1 block = 512byte. So you have ca 2000 bad blocks. That is A LOT. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> windows is still able to access all data. Linux is only able to |
| 22 |
> see partition table "for a while" - as you can see in dmesg. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> If firmware is broken then how it is possible that windows is able to |
| 25 |
> use this disk? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
maybe they ignore things like a reported size of 0 and no sense. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> Well.. I've backed up data from it already. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
then throw it away. That disk will fail completely soon. |
Archives