Archives
Archives
| From: | Allan Gottlieb <gottlieb@×××.edu> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Why is xulrunner-bin required for acroread in amd64 (xulrunner not OK) | ||
| Date: | Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:06:39 | ||
| Message-Id: | yu94oygvj3s.fsf@nyu.edu | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Why is xulrunner-bin required for acroread in amd64 (xulrunner not OK) by Neil Bothwick |
||
| 1 | At Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:02:03 +0000 Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:47:51 -0500, Allan Gottlieb wrote: |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | >> But why are the -bin packages good and the compile-from-source not good? |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > Because the -bin package is 32-bit, like acroread itself. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Thank you, I understand now. |
| 10 | allan |