1 |
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 06:40:02PM +0200, Florian Philipp wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> >> Windows compatibility is not a must, but a nice-to-have. That would reduce my |
4 |
> >> remaining choices to ExFAT, I presume. |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> |
7 |
> BTW: What's the Linux status on that one? |
8 |
|
9 |
Well, the German Wikipedia says that a stable 1.0 came out in January. |
10 |
It’s “only” a FUSE fs, but so is NTFS. I’ll do some testing with it. |
11 |
|
12 |
> > That's how I see it too. |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > I used to use ext4 for external media but quickly found that my notebook |
15 |
> > was the only box that could use them... |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Isn't group id 100 defined as the users group on most Linuxen nowadays? |
18 |
> |
19 |
> chgrp 100 $mount && chmod 2777 $mount |
20 |
|
21 |
That still leaves UID. I want it to “just work”[TM] and never encounter |
22 |
any problems when I can least use them, and never have to check any file |
23 |
attributes. |
24 |
|
25 |
> should work reasonably well. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Regards, |
28 |
> Florian Philipp |
29 |
|
30 |
I’ll keep the uid and gid bit on the stack. I would disable the x bit |
31 |
though. Executables are lime in DIR_COLORS, overriding every other |
32 |
colouring (e.g. red archive, green text and purple media files). *g* |
33 |
|
34 |
I’m more concerned about the behaviour of automounters. And I faintly |
35 |
remember some user-centric setting as to what the default chmod of new |
36 |
files is, so I would have to do some chmod -R from time to time. |
37 |
-- |
38 |
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla’ |
39 |
Please do not share anything from, with or about me with any Facebook service. |
40 |
|
41 |
Everyone speaks of saving energy. I save mine. |