1 |
On Monday 17 January 2011 22:45:39 kashani wrote: |
2 |
> On 1/17/2011 12:29 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
3 |
> > Not so much :-) |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > I too have db servers with 96G of ram. 5 of them, so I'm current. I'm |
6 |
> > just gobsmacked that a desktop needs 3G to build a compiler and system |
7 |
> > libs. It's consuming 2G to do that, I'll bet that 1.75G of that is pure |
8 |
> > wastage. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > Much like authors who proudly declare that they spent 7 years writing |
11 |
> > some magnum opus. It's a sure bet they were drunk of 6.5 of them :-) |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Not a compiler or system libs. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> "whenever I undertake a large emerge such as chromium or openoffice" |
16 |
> |
17 |
> OpenOffice. Nuff said. |
18 |
|
19 |
Yep, amd64 laptop with 4G RAM and 4G swap (for when I hibernate on it). |
20 |
Still, other than hibernating emerging openoffice is I think the only(?) |
21 |
package that actually makes use of swap. Not by much but uses it all the |
22 |
same. |
23 |
|
24 |
A x86 desktop with only 3G RAM also uses swap and it uses more of it than the |
25 |
laptop does when emerging openoffice. Same x86 desktop used to have 1G |
26 |
memory in the past and it used even more swap during OOo emerges. |
27 |
|
28 |
If I recall right OOo also complains that my /var/tmp is not larger than 6G. |
29 |
I won't be surprised if in a few years time it completely refuses to start the |
30 |
emerge because my /var/tmp is not 12G+ or some such! |
31 |
-- |
32 |
Regards, |
33 |
Mick |