| 1 |
On Nov 20, 2011 10:56 AM, "Dale" <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Pandu Poluan wrote: |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> So, any progress/updates on the attempt to replace udev with busybox's |
| 6 |
mdev? |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> As for my case, it's working well on XenServer and VMware ESX / |
| 9 |
>> vSphere (haven't found the time to test a VirtualBox installation |
| 10 |
>> yet). |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> Except for one annoyance: |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> Now, I've done the steps put forth by waltdnes here: |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/user/242563 |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> ... but every "eix-sync&& emerge -avuD @world" finds me having to |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
>> re-edit /usr/portage/virtual/dev-manager/dev-manager-0.ebuild, or else |
| 21 |
>> portage wants to emerge sys-apps/makedev and sys-fs/static-dev |
| 22 |
>> |
| 23 |
>> Is there a way to 'force' portage to use the edited |
| 24 |
>> dev-manager-0.ebuild and not the original version pulled in by |
| 25 |
>> eix-sync? |
| 26 |
>> |
| 27 |
>> Rgds, |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> Question: Is this going to be added to the shiney new Gentoo wiki at |
| 32 |
some point? The wiki needs some more content for sure. ;-) |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> I didn't know if ya'll had thought of this before or not. |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Well, although I can't read @waltdnes' mind, I'm sure he has that in mind. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
We're still ironing out the showstoppers. As soon as the generic |
| 40 |
glitches/annoyances (e.g., my 'fight' against portage reverting the .ebuild |
| 41 |
edits) are handled, I'm sure a w.g.o article will automagically appears ;-) |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
Rgds, |
Archives