1 |
On 15 Nov 2009, at 08:26, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 |
>> ... |
3 |
>> My typical experience is that the customer will take it completely on |
4 |
>> the chin and pay me to fix the problems. That doesn't make foul-ups |
5 |
>> due to such unnecessary meddling any less frustrating, though. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> My experience has been completely the opposite, same with just about |
8 |
> everyone |
9 |
> else I work with. But, this is a third-world country pretending to |
10 |
> be a first- |
11 |
> world country, and the cowboy attitude is very prevalent here. |
12 |
|
13 |
I certainly have had some customers like that, but generally they're a |
14 |
minority here. Definitely preferable is to spot them early and _follow |
15 |
your instinct_ to ditch them. The longer you entertain this rubbish |
16 |
the more of a headache it becomes. |
17 |
|
18 |
>> One has to hope, really, that the client only wants the root password |
19 |
>> as insurance in case you get run over by a bus, and won't use it to |
20 |
>> arbitrarily mess about on the system. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> I find the root password in a sealed envelope in the safe is the ideal |
23 |
> insurance for that. |
24 |
|
25 |
Totally agree. |
26 |
|
27 |
My biggest customer, unfortunately, has taken on a large investment of |
28 |
capital recently, resulting in a new director who's really pretty |
29 |
clueless. Basically, his dad bought him a job. He has insisted on |
30 |
Domain Administrator rights because he "just wants to do the simple |
31 |
stuff" himself; the first program he wanted to upgrade he needed my |
32 |
help with because the installer is a piece of junk. I know that he's |
33 |
going to mess things up and cost himself more money (create more |
34 |
hassles for me) in the long term, but he won't hear it and I can't |
35 |
just walk away; this is not only because I have a great relationship |
36 |
with the other owner and also because they're currently a significant |
37 |
proportion of my annual income. |
38 |
|
39 |
He's totally a nice bloke otherwise, he just feels that I shouldn't be |
40 |
"locking him out" of his own computers, and I can kinda see his point |
41 |
- as an admin it's easy for me to feel "territorial" because I'm |
42 |
pretty good at the job, so the chances are that anyone else isn't |
43 |
going to meet my standard. Obviously it's important for me to put that |
44 |
to one side. |
45 |
|
46 |
>>> So when he fucks things up good royal and proper, will he gladly |
47 |
>>> accept his shafting and pay you more to undo it? Or will he do the |
48 |
>>> usualcustomer stuntand blame you? |
49 |
|
50 |
This is actually much easier for those of us who are mere |
51 |
"consultants" and who charge by the hour - we can simply reply "it was |
52 |
working when i left, guv". If it's been working fine for months then |
53 |
there is obviously nothing wrong with our previous work. Clearly there |
54 |
is room for contention if they muck about with things right after |
55 |
you've left. |
56 |
|
57 |
Stroller. |