1 |
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Florian Philipp <lists@×××××××××××.net> wrote: |
2 |
> Am 29.05.2012 23:37, schrieb Rafa Griman: |
3 |
>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
>>> On Tue, 29 May 2012 22:56:07 +0200 |
5 |
>>> Rafa Griman <rafagriman@×××××.com> wrote: |
6 |
>>> |
7 |
>>>> Hi Vaeth :) |
8 |
>>>> |
9 |
>>>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Vaeth |
10 |
>>>> <vaeth@××××××××××××××××××××××××.de> wrote: |
11 |
>>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2012, Rafa Griman wrote: |
12 |
>>>>>> |
13 |
>>>>>> gawk: cmd. line:3: error: Unmatched [ or [^: /[^[:space:]]/ |
14 |
>>>>> |
15 |
>>>>> |
16 |
>>>>> Your gawk is broken. This happens if you emerged gawk with |
17 |
>>>>> current gcc and aggressive FLAGS like -DNDEBUG or -flto. |
18 |
>>>>> Not sure whether it is a bug of gawk or gcc. |
19 |
>>>> |
20 |
>>>> |
21 |
>>>> So it seems to be the CFLAGS :( As I said in my previous e-mail, I was |
22 |
>>>> "experimenting" a bit with them ... I'll be more conservative ;) |
23 |
>>> |
24 |
>>> Well, on the one hand the flags don;t seem to be too bad overall, but |
25 |
>>> on the other hand there's the golden rule of Gentoo: |
26 |
>>> |
27 |
>>> Don't stuff around with CFLAGS |
28 |
>>> |
29 |
>>> Why not? Well, there's the ricer phenomenon where changed CFLAGS |
30 |
>>> worsen performance and stability but the user's own bias convinces |
31 |
>>> him/her that it's actually vastly improved. |
32 |
>> |
33 |
>> |
34 |
>> I know that rule and tried not to be too agressive but seems I was O:) |
35 |
>> Since it's not my min machine, I was going to experiment (nothing |
36 |
>> "scientific", just curiosity) trying different options on different |
37 |
>> partitions and see how they work out. |
38 |
>> |
39 |
> |
40 |
> Out of curiosity: What flags do you run now? Do you know which flag |
41 |
> exactly caused the problem? They didn't seem too experimental though |
42 |
> -fno-inline looked odd. |
43 |
|
44 |
|
45 |
That one's it: -fno-inline. Removed it and now the error disappears. |
46 |
revdep-rebuild runs well now. |
47 |
|
48 |
Thanks all !!! |
49 |
|
50 |
Rafa |