| 1 |
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 07:09:07AM +0000, Martin Vaeth wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> So for non-developers, downloading with git does not necessarily |
| 4 |
> make sense. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> That being said, please do not consider this as an argument against |
| 7 |
> a change to git: For developers it has only advantages, and AFAIK, |
| 8 |
> it is not planned to cancel other download methods anyway. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Of course. This is not going to be a requirement. Non-developers should |
| 11 |
stick with rsync. No one meant to replace rsync with Git. It is about |
| 12 |
replacing CVS with Git. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Nicolas Sebrecht |
Archives