1 |
I usually keep the last version of GCC around until I've managed to rebuild the entire world with |
2 |
the newer one, just in case. If you've run the tasks mentioned after the newer version was |
3 |
installed, it should probably be safe. |
4 |
|
5 |
On 06/10/10 10:34, Daniel D Jones wrote: |
6 |
> |
7 |
> eix gcc shows: |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Installed versions: |
10 |
> |
11 |
> 4.3.4(4.3)!s(10:56:18 AM 02/27/2010)(gtk mudflap nls nptl openmp -altivec - |
12 |
> bootstrap -build -doc -fixed-point -fortran -gcj -hardened -libffi -multilib - |
13 |
> multislot -n32 -n64 -nocxx -nopie -objc -objc++ -objc-gc -test -vanilla) |
14 |
> |
15 |
> 4.4.3-r2(4.4)!s(08:29:19 PM 06/07/2010)(fortran gtk mudflap nls nptl openmp - |
16 |
> altivec -bootstrap -build -doc -fixed-point -gcj -graphite -hardened -libffi - |
17 |
> multilib -multislot -n32 -n64 -nocxx -objc -objc++ -objc-gc -test -vanilla) |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Is there any reason to have both of these installed? Is it safe to unmerge |
20 |
> 4.3.4? |
21 |
> |