1 |
On Montag 29 Juni 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 |
> Hi all, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> The company has a Juniper Secure Connect VPN and I run amd64. The process |
5 |
> is: log in via a web page in a browser, click a button and the page starts |
6 |
> a java APP to create the ssl tunnel - a full blown Swing app, not a mere |
7 |
> applet. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> I've only ever got this Java app to run in 32 bit Firefox with the |
10 |
> java-x86- emul package. 64 bit Firefox, Konqueror, Opera all fail. I've |
11 |
> tried sun-jdk, sun-jre (nsplugin and nsplugin-2), blackdown and icedtea. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> The only thing that works is firefox-bin with a 32bit jvm. The app doesn't |
14 |
> do much in the way of logging so I don't know why it's failing. This |
15 |
> strikes me as odd: |
16 |
> |
17 |
> A java app is bytecode that is independent of platform. It should make no |
18 |
> difference whether a 32bit or 64bit jvm executes the bytecode as the format |
19 |
> of the Java Virtual Machine and it's bytecode is constant. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Surely? |
22 |
|
23 |
yes, the bytecode is agnostic. But the vm is not - and look into the |
24 |
directory, tons and tons of old crap. If juniper is badly programmed, it might |
25 |
trigger some bug in the old stuff. |