1 |
To display 1920x1080 resolution with 32 bit colors, you need 8,294,400 |
2 |
bytes of video memory. So if you have more than eight megs of video |
3 |
mem you shouldn't need to buy a new one. |
4 |
|
5 |
have you tried something like |
6 |
|
7 |
xrandr --auto |
8 |
|
9 |
--- |
10 |
|
11 |
Petri Rosenström |
12 |
|
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 8:40 AM, <d.fedorov@×××××××.ru> wrote: |
16 |
>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 8:58 PM, <dennisonic@×××××.com> wrote: |
17 |
>> |
18 |
>>> On 24/08/10 03:38, Bill Longman wrote: |
19 |
>>> |
20 |
>>> |
21 |
>>> |
22 |
>>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Kevin O'Gorman |
23 |
>>> <kogorman@×××××.com>wrote: |
24 |
>>> |
25 |
>>>> I had to replace an 4:3 Westinghouse monitor this weekend. I got a new |
26 |
>>>> ASUS VH242H, which is very wide. But Xorg is still running 1280x1024, |
27 |
>>>> instead of the monitor's normal 1920x1080, according to xorg logs |
28 |
>>>> because of |
29 |
>>>> lack of video memory (using the ATI on the motherboard). I can make |
30 |
>>>> the |
31 |
>>>> screen use a 4:3 aspect ratio, so I'm up and running, much better than |
32 |
>>>> I |
33 |
>>>> started, but I'd like to do better. |
34 |
>>>> |
35 |
>>>> I guess I've gotta look for a video card, but all I have is PCIX slots, |
36 |
>>>> so |
37 |
>>>> I don't want to put a lot of money into it (I'll be upgrading the mobo |
38 |
>>>> when |
39 |
>>>> finances permit -- which is not right now.) |
40 |
>>>> |
41 |
>>>> Any ideas? |
42 |
>>>> |
43 |
>>> |
44 |
>>> |
45 |
>>> Have you tried setting different modelines etc using cvt and xrandr? |
46 |
>>> |
47 |
>> |
48 |
>> No. I ditched my xorg.conf completely; it had been there just because I |
49 |
>> couldn't get the Westinghouse monitor to work without it. The Xorg logs |
50 |
>> show it recognizes a boatload of |
51 |
>> modes that the monitor likes, but gives an alibi for not using the HD |
52 |
>> ones. |
53 |
>> The approach |
54 |
>> does not seem promising. |
55 |
>> |
56 |
>> /var/log/Xorg.0.log attached. I'm paying attention to lines 269 295 327 |
57 |
>> 369 |
58 |
>> 377 380 and 381 |
59 |
>> |
60 |
>> 269: (II) MACH64(0): Modeline "1920x1080"x0.0 148.50 1920 2008 2052 2200 |
61 |
>> 1080 1084 1089 1125 +hsync +vsync (67.5 kHz) |
62 |
>> 295: (II) MACH64(0): Modeline "1920x1080"x60.0 172.80 1920 2040 2248 |
63 |
>> 2576 |
64 |
>> 1080 1081 1084 1118 -hsync +vsync (67.1 kHz) |
65 |
>> 327: (II) MACH64(0): Estimated virtual size for aspect ratio 1.7931 is |
66 |
>> 1920x1080 |
67 |
>> 369: (II) MACH64(0): Not using default mode "1920x1440" (insufficient |
68 |
>> memory |
69 |
>> for mode) |
70 |
>> 377: (II) MACH64(0): Not using driver mode "1920x1080" (bad mode |
71 |
>> clock/interlace/doublescan) |
72 |
>> 380: (II) MACH64(0): Not using driver mode "1920x1080" (bad mode |
73 |
>> clock/interlace/doublescan) |
74 |
>> 381: (WW) MACH64(0): Shrinking virtual size estimate from 1920x1080 to |
75 |
>> 1280x1024 |
76 |
>> |
77 |
>> -- |
78 |
>> Kevin O'Gorman, PhD |
79 |
>> |
80 |
> |
81 |
> 1) Did you made entries for right resolution mode in xorg.conf |
82 |
> 2) Are u sure that 1920x1080 is supported resolution for your monitor? |
83 |
> 3) BIOS of some graphic cards is trying to overide the data reported by |
84 |
> the monitor in its own way |
85 |
> |
86 |
> |
87 |
> |