| 1 |
On Friday 19 October 2007, James wrote: |
| 2 |
> Justin T. <purplegecko <at> gmx.net> writes: |
| 3 |
> > > The process for the https://nagios.blah-blah.com protocol died |
| 4 |
> > > unexpectedly. ======================================================= |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > <snip> |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > > This seems to be a recently developed behaviour. Other browsers do not |
| 9 |
> > > have such problems. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > There seems to be an issue with Konqueror and some of the new Openssl |
| 12 |
> > versions. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> You may want to install JFFNMS (in portage)[1] and see if you get |
| 15 |
> weird browser behavior with that Network Management System. You may also |
| 16 |
> discover many advanced features that make jffnms much more appealing |
| 17 |
> than Nagios..... hence the phrase that is popular with many jffnms users: |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> 'Adios Nagios' |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Thanks James, but the server owner wants Nagios (for now). Is there a link to |
| 22 |
a (factual) comparative summary between the two monitoring systems? Does |
| 23 |
JFFNMS have as many plugins as Nagios? I'd be grateful for your (subjective) |
| 24 |
views too. :) |
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Regards, |
| 27 |
Mick |
Archives