Archives
Archives
| From: | Grant <emailgrant@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Mutually exclusive ebuilds? | ||
| Date: | Sun, 22 Feb 2009 16:33:30 | ||
| Message-Id: | 49bf44f10902220833p132fb406w30e7b086bfcecfc@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Re: Mutually exclusive ebuilds? by James |
||
| 1 | >> There are good ebuilds here: |
| 2 | >> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131527 |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > thx grant, |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > I'll just wait till it goes testing, then try |
| 7 | > it. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Don't hold your breath. :) 1.2.8 was working perfectly for a long |
| 10 | time before 2.0 was released and there was never even a hint of |
| 11 | portage folks considering it in the bug. It's a GREAT app and 2.0 is |
| 12 | a huge step up. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | - Grant |
| 15 | |
| 16 | > |
| 17 | > I've got enough to hax @ these days..... |
| 18 | > |
| 19 | > |
| 20 | > |
| 21 | > |
| 22 | > |
| 23 | > James |