Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: "Canek Peláez Valdés" <caneko@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] No mailer for Gentoo???
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 16:53:09
Message-Id: CADPrc81ivi=1nVN647iAMTKuxKDP0gOjpHPi0ZLhmkiN-WcX9w@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] No mailer for Gentoo??? by Jarry
1 On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Jarry <mr.jarry@×××××.com> wrote:
2 > On 06-Sep-13 18:29, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
3 >>
4 >> On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Jarry <mr.jarry@×××××.com> wrote:
5 >>>
6 >>> On 06-Sep-13 18:14, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
7 >>>>
8 >>>>
9 >>>> On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Jarry <mr.jarry@×××××.com> wrote:
10 >>>>>
11 >>>>>
12 >>>>> On 06-Sep-13 17:32, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
13 >>>>>>
14 >>>>>>
15 >>>>>>
16 >>>>>> On 09/06/2013 11:23 AM, Jarry wrote:
17 >>>>>>>>
18 >>>>>>>>
19 >>>>>>>>
20 >>>>>>>>
21 >>>>>>>> It wasn't part of @system before, you just removed the thing that
22 >>>>>>>> pulled
23 >>>>>>>> it in.
24 >>>>>>>
25 >>>>>>>
26 >>>>>>>
27 >>>>>>>
28 >>>>>>> No I did not. mail-mta/ssmtp was part of stage3. And I did not
29 >>>>>>> remove now any "thing" that pulled it in. All I did was
30 >>>>>>> "emerge --ask --update --deep --newuse world".
31 >>>>>>>
32 >>>>>>> As a result, python-exec, python-argparse and libxml2 were
33 >>>>>>> reinstalled and automake-wrapper, gtk-doc-am, eselect and
34 >>>>>>> linux-header updated. Nothing else.
35 >>>>>>>
36 >>>>>>> After that I did "emerge --depclean" and the above mentioned
37 >>>>>>> packages were suddenly removed...
38 >>>>>>>
39 >>>>>>
40 >>>>>> It could be that a package's deps were updated to no longer include
41 >>>>>> virtual/mta. But it was never part of @system, you can check for
42 >>>>>> yourself:
43 >>>>>>
44 >>>>>>
45 >>>>>>
46 >>>>>>
47 >>>>>> http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/profiles/base/packages?view=log
48 >>>>>
49 >>>>>
50 >>>>>
51 >>>>>
52 >>>>> Then something got broken because I have packages installed
53 >>>>> that need mailer (i.e. app-admin/monit or sys-fs/mdadm are
54 >>>>> configured to send emails). And these packages do not have
55 >>>>> "mail" use-flag, because their maintainers apparently expect
56 >>>>> standard *nix mailer (/usr/bin/sendmail) exists on the system...
57 >>>>>
58 >>>>> So now I have "stable" system, updated to the latest level,
59 >>>>> where a lot of things suddenly do not work. This should *never*
60 >>>>> happen! If it was some package's dep that caused it, it's clear
61 >>>>> this change was premature...
62 >>>>
63 >>>>
64 >>>>
65 >>>> I think is a bug in the packages. In my system the only package that
66 >>>> pulls vitual/mta (and therefore ssmtp) is vixie-cron.
67 >>>
68 >>>
69 >>>
70 >>> That is strange. I have sys-process/vixie-cron-4.1-r12 and yet
71 >>> revdep-rebuild does not want to pull virtual/mta. But It should,
72 >>> as cron can be configured to send emails too.
73 >>
74 >>
75 >> Read my last mail; they changed the RDEPEND for the cron eclass.
76 >>
77 >>> As I wrote: there are *many* packages that expect standard
78 >>> *nix mailer exists! If it does not, a lot of packages must
79 >>> be fixed to include mailer as dependency.
80 >>
81 >>
82 >> The devs disagree. I think I'm with them; the packages in question
83 >> actually work, it just happens that they can't send mails anymore. If
84 >> you need/want them to send mails, install an MTA.
85 >>
86 >
87 > "Just" can't send mails. So if mdadm detects failed drive in raid1
88 > and I do not get mail about it, I will discover it at least when
89 > the 2nd drive fails. That's a relief...
90
91 I believe we can trust Gentoo users to know when they have (or not) an MTA.
92
93 > Why is there no global use-variable "mta"? Why not even local
94 > for packages that might use mailer? This goes completely against
95 > Gentoo-principles, if user has to search which other packages are
96 > required and install them manually. Is it not what we have
97 > use-flags for?
98
99 The problem with USE flags is that they trigger a recompile when they
100 change. In this case a recompile is completely unnecessary, since the
101 package *works* with and without an MTA. As I said, the only
102 difference is that you can (or not) send mails.
103
104 I don't see a problem with that; if you need an MTA, install an MTA.
105 If you think is a problem, file a bug.
106
107 But I think it will be closed as WONTFIX.
108
109 Regards.
110 --
111 Canek Peláez Valdés
112 Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
113 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México