Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Linux USB security holes.
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 06:03:02
Message-Id: 3cd9d629-8be8-4b5d-b702-912f26a06bd5@gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Linux USB security holes. by Dale
1 Dale wrote:
2 > Howdy,
3 >
4 > I ran up on this link.  Is there any truth to it and should any of us
5 > Gentooers be worried about it?
6 >
7 > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/11/07/linux_usb_security_bugs/ 
8 >
9 > Isn't Linux supposed to be more secure than this??
10 >
11 > Dale
12 >
13 > :-)  :-) 
14 >
15
16
17 To reply to all that posted so far.  I did see that it requires physical
18 access, like a lot of other things.  Once a person has physical access,
19 there are a number of things that can go wrong. 
20
21 It does seem to be one of those things that while possible, has anyone
22 been able to do it in the real world and even without physical access? 
23 Odds are, no. 
24
25 Still, all things considered, Linux is pretty secure.  BSD is more
26 secure from what I've read but Linux is better than windoze. 
27
28 Dale
29
30 :-)  :-) 

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Linux USB security holes. R0b0t1 <r030t1@×××××.com>