Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com>
To: Gentoo User <gentoo-user@l.g.o>
Subject: [gentoo-user] ECC-ram, it is worth it.
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 17:39:14
1 [894019.770058] [Hardware Error]: MC4 Error (node 0): DRAM ECC error
2 detected on the NB.
3 [894019.770084] EDAC MC0: 1 CE on mc#0csrow#2channel#0 (csrow:2
4 channel:0 page:0x2aa6ce offset:0xc60 grain:0 syndrome:0x63e1)
5 [894019.770090] [Hardware Error]: Error Status: Corrected error, no
6 action required.
7 [894019.770098] [Hardware Error]: CPU:0 (10:4:2)
8 MC4_STATUS[-|CE|MiscV|-|AddrV|CECC]: 0x9c70c00063080a13
9 [894019.770105] [Hardware Error]: MC4_ADDR: 0x00000002aa6cec60
10 [894019.770110] [Hardware Error]: cache level: L3/GEN, mem/io: MEM,
11 mem-tx: RD, part-proc: RES (no timeout)
13 and this, my children, is why I am using ECC ram.
15 Using zfs showed me, that there are errors that the system does not
16 catch but corrupts data.
18 And this evening, with a thunderstorm outside I got that beauty above...


Subject Author
[gentoo-user] Re: ECC-ram, it is worth it. Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.com>
[gentoo-user] Re: ECC-ram, it is worth it. walt <w41ter@×××××.com>