Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: James <wireless@×××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: udev downgrade
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 02:56:41
Message-Id: loom.20130104T034050-613@post.gmane.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] udev downgrade by James
1 James <wireless <at> tampabay.rr.com> writes:
2
3
4 > So unless somebody can give me good reason, I'm downgrading to
5 > udev-171 asap on this (only) system running udev 196.......
6 > (ps, I like to experiment, but not with udev et. al.)
7
8 Long night, when you have to answer your own posts.....
9
10 Now I get:
11
12
13 emerge -p1u udev
14
15 These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
16
17 Calculating dependencies... done!
18 [ebuild UD ] sys-fs/udev-171-r9 [196-r1] USE="rule_generator%*
19 -action_modeswitch% -build% -debug% -edd% (-extras) -floppy% {-test%}"
20 [blocks B ] <sys-fs/udev-186 ("<sys-fs/udev-186" is blocking
21 sys-fs/udev-init-scripts-17-r1)
22
23 !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled
24 !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict:
25
26 sys-fs/udev:0
27
28 (sys-fs/udev-196-r1::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
29
30 >=sys-fs/udev-196-r1[gudev?,hwdb?,introspection?,keymap?,selinux?,static-libs?]
31 required by (virtual/udev-196::gentoo, installed)
32
33 (sys-fs/udev-171-r9::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by
34 (no parents that aren't satisfied by other packages in this slot)
35
36
37 ideas?
38
39
40 James

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev downgrade Bruce Hill <daddy@×××××××××××××××××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev downgrade "Dustin C. Hatch" <admiralnemo@×××××.com>