Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Nick Khamis <symack@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user <gentoo-user@l.g.o>
Subject: [gentoo-user] Fine Tuning NTP Server
Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 22:48:02
Message-Id: CAGWRaZZE65humDFK4_WP1UWCvDh4JRU6Q-a+UYiarWFx4V6=Mw@mail.gmail.com
1 Hello Everyone,
2
3 A while back I was inquiring about the best way to have computers on
4 the network synched. Long story short, we opted to go with an NTP
5 server installed on one machine, and synching the rest of the machines
6 against it.
7
8 However, I am not sure if the NTP server is properly synched with the
9 public stratum 2 server furthermore, it does not seem like the clients
10 are synced with the base server:
11
12 ntpq -p
13 remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter
14 ========================================================
15 *tick.nrc.com .GPS. 1 u 52h 36h 2 56.036 8.131 0.445
16 tock.nrc.com .INIT. 16 u - 36h 0 0.000 0.000 0.000
17 192.168.2.255 .BCST. 16 u - 1024 0 0.000 0.000 0.000
18
19
20 And one of the clients:
21
22 ntpq -p
23 remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter
24 ========================================================
25 time.server 128.233.154.245 2 u 32 64 377 0.168 25539.9 40.427
26
27 I have to be honest, not sure what those fields mean, but when I manually check
28 the machines using the date command, i see that clients are ~20 sec behind.
29
30 Was wondering how to best manipulate sync given our reliance on an outside ntp
31 server. We are not looking for nanosecond synching, but at least down
32 to the second
33 would be efficient.
34
35 Finally, is "refid 128.233.154.245" on client's pointing to the
36 outside stratum server normal
37 behaviour? Shoild "refid" not be pointing to our NTP server?
38
39
40 Your help is greatly appreciated,
41
42 Nick.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Fine Tuning NTP Server Andrea Conti <alyf@××××.net>