1 |
JimD wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, April 5, 2006 6:00 pm, Tamas Sarga wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> Hi, |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> I had nvidia-kernel-8178-r3 and nvidia-glx-8178. Now the latest |
8 |
>> nvidia-kernel is 8174-r1 with ~x86 keyword. Do anybody knows where |
9 |
>> nvidia-kernel-8178-r3 disappeared, and why. It is simply disappeared |
10 |
>> from the repository, I don't find it in /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask. |
11 |
>> |
12 |
>> TIA. |
13 |
>> Tamas Sarga |
14 |
>> |
15 |
> |
16 |
> I just did a sync 1 minute ago and here is what I got: |
17 |
> |
18 |
> total 122K |
19 |
> drwxr-xr-x 3 portage portage 544 Mar 24 17:06 ./ |
20 |
> drwxr-xr-x 170 portage portage 4.5K Apr 5 19:07 ../ |
21 |
> -rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 35K Mar 24 17:06 ChangeLog |
22 |
> -rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 21K Mar 24 17:06 Manifest |
23 |
> drwxr-xr-x 10 portage portage 648 Apr 5 19:07 files/ |
24 |
> -rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 313 Apr 25 2005 metadata.xml |
25 |
> -rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 4.5K Oct 28 03:35 nvidia-kernel-1.0.6111-r3.ebuild |
26 |
> -rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 4.7K Jan 10 14:59 nvidia-kernel-1.0.6629-r5.ebuild |
27 |
> -rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 3.9K Oct 28 03:35 nvidia-kernel-1.0.7167-r1.ebuild |
28 |
> -rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 4.2K Jan 24 10:03 nvidia-kernel-1.0.7174-r2.ebuild |
29 |
> -rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 4.5K Oct 28 03:35 nvidia-kernel-1.0.7667.ebuild |
30 |
> -rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 4.6K Oct 28 03:19 nvidia-kernel-1.0.7676-r1.ebuild |
31 |
> -rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 3.5K Dec 7 16:32 nvidia-kernel-1.0.8174-r1.ebuild |
32 |
> -rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 3.6K Mar 24 15:36 nvidia-kernel-1.0.8178-r3.ebuild |
33 |
> |
34 |
> Maybe try to sync again? |
35 |
> |
36 |
> Jim |
37 |
> |
38 |
Hi, |
39 |
|
40 |
I synced just now. |
41 |
# ls /usr/portage/media-video/nvidia-kernel/ |
42 |
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 35048 Apr 8 06:09 ChangeLog |
43 |
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5901 Apr 8 06:09 Manifest |
44 |
drwxr-xr-x 10 root root 4096 Apr 9 12:37 files |
45 |
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 313 Apr 25 2005 metadata.xml |
46 |
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4523 Oct 28 09:35 nvidia-kernel-1.0.6111-r3.ebuild |
47 |
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4772 Jan 10 20:59 nvidia-kernel-1.0.6629-r5.ebuild |
48 |
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3982 Oct 28 09:35 nvidia-kernel-1.0.7167-r1.ebuild |
49 |
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4277 Jan 24 16:03 nvidia-kernel-1.0.7174-r2.ebuild |
50 |
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4538 Oct 28 09:35 nvidia-kernel-1.0.7667.ebuild |
51 |
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4669 Oct 28 09:19 nvidia-kernel-1.0.7676-r1.ebuild |
52 |
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3584 Dec 7 22:32 nvidia-kernel-1.0.8174-r1.ebuild |
53 |
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3585 Mar 24 21:36 nvidia-kernel-1.0.8178-r3.ebuild |
54 |
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3540 Apr 8 05:45 nvidia-kernel-1.0.8756.ebuild |
55 |
|
56 |
So yes, the ebuild is there, but |
57 |
#equery l -p nvidia-kernel |
58 |
[ Searching for package 'nvidia-kernel' in all categories among: ] |
59 |
* installed packages |
60 |
[I--] [M ] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.8178-r3 (0) |
61 |
* Portage tree (/usr/portage) |
62 |
[-P-] [ -] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.6111-r3 (0) |
63 |
[-P-] [ -] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.6629-r5 (0) |
64 |
[-P-] [M~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.7167-r1 (0) |
65 |
[-P-] [M~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.7174-r2 (0) |
66 |
[-P-] [M~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.7667 (0) |
67 |
[-P-] [M~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.7676-r1 (0) |
68 |
[-P-] [M~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.8174-r1 (0) |
69 |
[-P-] [ ~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.8756 (0) |
70 |
|
71 |
So I must move somewhere. Portage suggested downgrade, because I |
72 |
keyworded nvidia-kernel by version. |
73 |
Anyway, I keyworded 1.0.8756. I will see what will happen. |
74 |
But I don't see the reasons, why emerge doesn't see 1.0.8178-r3. |
75 |
|
76 |
2 minutes later: |
77 |
Sorry, I realized just now, that it is hardmasked. So the question has |
78 |
changed. How can I figure out why it was hardmasked? |
79 |
/usr/portage/profiles/package.mask doesn't contain it. |
80 |
|
81 |
TIA. |
82 |
Tamas Sarga |
83 |
-- |
84 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |