| 1 |
Hello |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 11:35:25PM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 4 |
> On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 00:01:24 +0200, Michal 'vorner' Vaner wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > portage can use any directory you like for its workspace, you don't |
| 6 |
> > > have to remote mount /var to achieve this. You could mount /var/tmp |
| 7 |
> > > over NFS, but setting PORTAGE_TMPDIR is less kludgy. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > Well, seems on the same level for me, but that is only personal |
| 10 |
> > preference. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> It's not the same at all. you are advocating mounting the whole of /var |
| 13 |
> on a networked filesystem, which could affect the performance of the |
| 14 |
> system as a whole. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Yes, which I was glad - the NFS filesystem was faster than local disk :D |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
But that is not the point, as nothing run at the time (the machine had |
| 19 |
enough anyway). |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Have a nice day |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Wait few minutes before opening this email. The temperature difference |
| 25 |
could lead to vapour condensation. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Michal "vorner" Vaner |
Archives