| 1 |
Hello, |
| 2 |
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 04:49:48PM -0800, Bob Young wrote: |
| 3 |
> Now with regards to eth1, it is my intent to configure eth1 as with the |
| 4 |
> machines only public IP address (69.12.134.79), and configure BIND to listen |
| 5 |
> on eth1 as a secondary domain name server, the primary domain name server |
| 6 |
> would have an "A Record" for 69.12.134.79 and it would be named |
| 7 |
> ns.somedomainname.com. IOW it would have a different "base" name (ns) than |
| 8 |
> eth0 (gentoo). My question is whether or not this is valid/"legal"/okay, |
| 9 |
> i.e. is it likely to cause any problems? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I do not see why this would be forbidden, however I think it would be a |
| 12 |
good idea to let gentoo.somedomainname.com resolv to the same IP as |
| 13 |
ns.somedomainname.com. Or better, ns be a pointer to gentoo (if that is |
| 14 |
possible, I'm not sure here). It is for clarity and - well, this one is |
| 15 |
crazy, but it IMO adds to the computer's "personality" and the computer |
| 16 |
deserves a proper name. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
With regards. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Hallowed be the zeroes and ones |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Michal "vorner" Vaner |
Archives