1 |
Michael Hampicke wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> You should have a look at xfs. |
4 |
> |
5 |
> I used to use ext4 earlier, traversing through /usr/portage used |
6 |
> to be very slow. When I switched xfs, speed increased drastically. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> This might be kind of unrelated, but makes sense. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> |
11 |
> I guess traversing through directories may be faster with XFS, but in |
12 |
> my experience ext4 perfoms better than XFS in regard to operations |
13 |
> (cp, rm) on small files. |
14 |
> I read that there are some tuning options for XFS and small files, but |
15 |
> never tried it. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> But if somone seconds XFS I will try it too. |
18 |
|
19 |
It's been a while since I messed with this but isn't XFS the one that |
20 |
hates power failures and such? |
21 |
|
22 |
Dale |
23 |
|
24 |
:-) :-) |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |