| 1 |
Am Sonntag 18 September 2011, 09:58:10 schrieb Michael Mol: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Am Sonntag 18 September 2011, 15:19:29 schrieb pk: |
| 6 |
> > again, if it you say 'it must be bad because there is a bug in it' you |
| 7 |
> > can disregard all software ever written. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> This is why, when designing systems, you want as little complexity as |
| 10 |
> possible; the greater the complexity, the greater the incidence of |
| 11 |
> bugs. Yes, it's unavoidable that there are bugs, but lower bug counts |
| 12 |
> are better. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> (Not making a specific argument against D-Bus here, just the rhetorical |
| 15 |
> device.) |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
yeah and if you simplified your system enough it is so hard to use it is not |
| 18 |
worth the time you waste on it. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Every problem can be solved by another layer of abstraction |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
A similar good sounding quote - but..... |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
#163933 |
Archives