| 1 |
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 10:33:11 -0400 (EDT), Bruce Hill, Jr. wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > > And for the Lennart fanboi, his coding is |
| 4 |
> > > so questionable that "Lennartware" has become derogatory slang. (Of |
| 5 |
> > > course, you already know that.) |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > And this is such a common term nowadays that when Googling for |
| 8 |
> > Lennartware only one reference to it turn up on the first page, and |
| 9 |
> > that is your post! |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> mingdao@workstation ~ $ grep Lennartware irclogs/* |
| 12 |
> irclogs/#gentoo-dev.log:09:01 <@bonsaikitten> Caster: do you see now |
| 13 |
> why I don't appreciate Lennartware? |
| 14 |
> irclogs/#gentoo.log:10:56 <@bonsaikitten> Zaba: Lennartware. Linux |
| 15 |
> needs to be more like MacOS |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Wow, 2 mentions on IRC - the term really has invaded the English |
| 18 |
language. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> <--- 4 references |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Still not enough for Google to see it, barely enough for a contrived |
| 23 |
allegation. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
> Various other mentions of systemd being nefarious software are mostly |
| 26 |
> amongst kernel devs and might not use the word "Lennartware", but the |
| 27 |
> logical reasons why systemd is a _bad_ idea are the same. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Where does systemd come into it? Gentoo is following udev's upstream |
| 30 |
requirements. These may have been triggered by udev's support for systemd |
| 31 |
but that in no way means that systemd is required. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Greg K-H is also in favour of making /usr available to early boot, are |
| 34 |
you going to accuse him of shoddy coding too? |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
"Of course, I could switch back to Windows. At least there, if I have a |
| 41 |
problem, I don't suffer under the illusion that I could ever fix it." - |
| 42 |
Unknown (paraphrased) |
Archives