Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] fsck and mount by label
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 13:06:23
Message-Id: CA+czFiCm_uPbL3iL_sPT=fq1GAoZ8TCBeo==NJ65+oF+FnvJRA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] fsck and mount by label by Florian Philipp
1 On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 5:06 AM, Florian Philipp <lists@×××××××××××.net> wrote:
2 > Am 30.07.2011 16:01, schrieb Michael Mol:
3 >> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Florian Philipp <lists@×××××××××××.net> wrote:
4 >>> Hello list!
5 >>>
6 >>> I've noticed the following in my rc.log file:
7 >>> [file system mounting ...]
8 >>> opt: clean, 3127/6496 files, 108510/209920 blocks
9 >>> fsck.ext4: Unable to resolve »LABEL=backup«
10 >>>  * Operational error
11 >>>
12 >>> The backup disk is the only one (besides boot and root) which is mounted
13 >>> by label. After booting, I find that the backup disk was mounted
14 >>> correctly. If I then try to run
15 >>> `fsck.ext4 "LABEL=backup"`, it works as expected.
16 >>>
17 >>> Does anyone have an explanation for this?
18 >>
19 >> Could it be that the volume 'backup' is on isn't available yet? (i.e.
20 >> brought up by lvm later in the boot process)
21 >>
22 >
23 > I thought of this, as well, especially because it is a firewire disk.
24 > But then why is it mounted correctly?
25
26 It might be brought up by an automounter later on. You might try
27 removing the entry from fstab, and see if it still gets mounted.
28
29 --
30 :wq