1 |
On Fri, 18 May 2007 16:40:30 +0100 |
2 |
Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Hi All, |
5 |
> |
6 |
> eix and portage are telling me: |
7 |
> ======================================== |
8 |
> [D] www-servers/boa |
9 |
> Available versions: [M]0.94.13 [M]0.94.13-r1 |
10 |
> [M]~0.94.14_alpha20 [M]~0.94.14_alpha20-r1 [M]~0.94.14_rc21 |
11 |
> Installed versions: 0.94.13-r1(16:46:05 03/19/07)(-tetex) |
12 |
> Homepage: http://www.boa.org/ |
13 |
> Description: Boa - A very small and very fast http daemon |
14 |
> ======================================== |
15 |
> |
16 |
> However, http://packages.gentoo.org/search/?sstring=boa is still |
17 |
> shown as stable. The Changelog is not showing anything to explain |
18 |
> why it has been masked. Am I missing something? |
19 |
> |
20 |
> If Boa is indeed a gonner, what would you recommend I use to share my |
21 |
> distfiles with other boxen on my LAN? |
22 |
nfs. |
23 |
|
24 |
I have been using nfs for portage and distfiles with much success |
25 |
so far. I find that nfs access for portage is only a little slower |
26 |
than having it on a local, unoptimized partition. I save lots of time |
27 |
with this method, since my new hosts on the network have instant |
28 |
portage trees without having to wait for that long portage extraction. |
29 |
I mount /usr/portage read-only and then distfiles read-write over the |
30 |
top so that I can save new downloads if I need to. |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |