Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Dan Farrell <dan@×××××××××.cx>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Boa is now hard masked?
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 16:24:52
Message-Id: 20070518110452.20b81774@voyager
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Boa is now hard masked? by Mick
1 On Fri, 18 May 2007 16:40:30 +0100
2 Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote:
3
4 > Hi All,
5 >
6 > eix and portage are telling me:
7 > ========================================
8 > [D] www-servers/boa
9 > Available versions: [M]0.94.13 [M]0.94.13-r1
10 > [M]~0.94.14_alpha20 [M]~0.94.14_alpha20-r1 [M]~0.94.14_rc21
11 > Installed versions: 0.94.13-r1(16:46:05 03/19/07)(-tetex)
12 > Homepage: http://www.boa.org/
13 > Description: Boa - A very small and very fast http daemon
14 > ========================================
15 >
16 > However, http://packages.gentoo.org/search/?sstring=boa is still
17 > shown as stable. The Changelog is not showing anything to explain
18 > why it has been masked. Am I missing something?
19 >
20 > If Boa is indeed a gonner, what would you recommend I use to share my
21 > distfiles with other boxen on my LAN?
22 nfs.
23
24 I have been using nfs for portage and distfiles with much success
25 so far. I find that nfs access for portage is only a little slower
26 than having it on a local, unoptimized partition. I save lots of time
27 with this method, since my new hosts on the network have instant
28 portage trees without having to wait for that long portage extraction.
29 I mount /usr/portage read-only and then distfiles read-write over the
30 top so that I can save new downloads if I need to.
31
32 --
33 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list