1 |
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Adam Carter <adamcarter3@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> |
4 |
> config_eth0=( "77.xxx.104.14/24" ) |
5 |
>> routes_eth0=( "default via 77.xxx.104.1" ) |
6 |
>> config_eth0:1=( "77.xxx.104.100/24" ) |
7 |
>> routes_eth0:1=( "default via 77.xxx.104.1" ) |
8 |
>> config_eth0:2=( "77.xxx.104.101/24" ) |
9 |
>> routes_eth0:2=( "default via 77.xxx.104.1" ) |
10 |
>> config_eth0:3=( "77.xxx.105.100/24" ) |
11 |
>> routes_eth0:3=( "default via 77.xxx.105.1" ) |
12 |
>> |
13 |
> |
14 |
> You should let us know what you're trying to achieve with this. Every time |
15 |
> I have seen config like this, it has been because of fundamental |
16 |
> misunderstandings of networking. More that one IP address on a subnet |
17 |
> (unless there are VIPs) = fail. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Remember routing occurs at layer 3, and for most configs should have no |
20 |
> reference physical interface. The OS knows which interface the next hop can |
21 |
> be found. In your config you've set the same route three times which makes |
22 |
> no sense. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> (ok i've oversimplified, but for 99.9% of cases the above is true) |
25 |
> |
26 |
|
27 |
I have this on Debian in /etc/network/interfaces: |
28 |
|
29 |
auto lo |
30 |
iface lo inet loopback |
31 |
auto eth0 |
32 |
iface eth0 inet static |
33 |
address 82.xxx.148.194 |
34 |
netmask 255.255.255.128 |
35 |
gateway 82.xxx.148.131 |
36 |
auto eth0:1 |
37 |
iface eth0:1 inet static |
38 |
address 82.xxx.148.195 |
39 |
netmask 255.255.255.128 |
40 |
auto eth0:2 |
41 |
iface eth0:2 inet static |
42 |
address 82.xxx.148.196 |
43 |
netmask 255.255.255.128 |
44 |
auto eth0:3 |
45 |
iface eth0:3 inet static |
46 |
address 82.xxx.148.197 |
47 |
netmask 255.255.255.128 |
48 |
|
49 |
|
50 |
What I want to know is what is equivalent for this on Gentoo. Let's just |
51 |
say this is VPS server with 4 IP's assigned to me as customer |
52 |
|
53 |
|
54 |
-- |
55 |
Amar Ćosić |
56 |
amar.cosic@×××××.com |