| 1 |
Arttu V. <arttuv69@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On 8/22/10, covici@××××××××××.com <covici@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > Hi. I am running the unstable gentoo 32-bit and today I emerged -- |
| 5 |
> > amoung other packages in a system update -- glibc-2.12.1-r1, however |
| 6 |
> > after doing this at least one package had an undefined reference to |
| 7 |
> > S_ISCHR. I tried to downgrade glibc, but apparently this is not |
| 8 |
> > supported and I am a bit stumped as to how to fix this problem. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > Any ideas on this would be appreciated. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Which package is failing? Please check if it is already reported, and |
| 13 |
> if not then please report a new bug, and if possible make it block |
| 14 |
> this tracker bug: |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331665 |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> A wild guess out of the blue would be that the error could be simply a |
| 19 |
> missing include of stat.h in the package's sources. But there might be |
| 20 |
> other omissions as well, so please provide more info. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> I think that unless API/ABIs were changed then the older, already |
| 23 |
> installed version should still work just fine, as then the missing |
| 24 |
> includes would only affect compile-time situation. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
OK, I will check on that -- I am thinking that for that package a |
| 27 |
missing include will fix this, but I could shoot whoever broke this |
| 28 |
without thinking at all. I wonder if the failure of php to compile |
| 29 |
because my_compiler.h is missing has something to do with this also? |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: |
| 34 |
How do |
| 35 |
you spend it? |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
John Covici |
| 38 |
covici@××××××××××.com |
Archives