| 1 |
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Ian Zimmerman <itz@×××××××.net> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 2016-11-14 23:52, Jorge Almeida wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> Good to know. I'm currently testing openbox without dbus-launch. No |
| 5 |
>> problem yet. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Do you _know_ a reason you need dbus, at all? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
No. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> If you don't, you don't need it ;-) |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I would like to believe that. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Typically, a lot of GUI apps have dbus as a soft dependency for the sole |
| 18 |
> purpose of avoiding multiple instances. So starting the app for the |
| 19 |
> second time just activates (in some general sense) the old window. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Seems harmless enough. But how did they manage to convince nearly |
| 22 |
everybody that dbus is the best invention next to sliced bread? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Jorge |
Archives