From: | Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Should I be worried that I won't be able to dual boot in Gentoo? | ||
Date: | Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:19:01 | ||
Message-Id: | CAK2H+ecxw7U4ZmRYiE09zaPzKYhzZyH+u9wdmpE=vX6R=1EkPg@mail.gmail.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Should I be worried that I won't be able to dual boot in Gentoo? by Nilesh Govindarajan |
1 | On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 8:10 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan |
2 | <contact@××××××××.com> wrote: |
3 | > On Mon 26 Sep 2011 08:31:10 PM IST, Mick wrote: |
4 | >> I don't know if you have seen this. Given that we're moving into UEFI |
5 | >> boot what are the workarounds to compensate for Microsoft's efforts to |
6 | >> exclude other operating systems from available hardware? |
7 | >> |
8 | >> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/09/26/uefi_linux_lock_out_row_latest/ |
9 | >> |
10 | > |
11 | > That feature is optional, see official word from MS: |
12 | > https://blogs.msdn.com/b/b8/archive/2011/09/22/protecting-the-pre-os-environment-with-uefi.aspx |
13 | > Microsoft has at least done something good for the Linux community :D |
14 | > |
15 | > -- |
16 | > Nilesh Govindarajan |
17 | > http://nileshgr.com |
18 | |
19 | It's only optional if the BIOS includes an option to disable the |
20 | feature. I don't think that option is _required_ by Microsoft so if |
21 | (insert name here) contracts with their BIOS developer to not include |
22 | that option then I believe we're potentially out of luck. |
23 | |
24 | - Mark |