| 1 |
On Sunday 04 May 2014 12:37:02 J. Roeleveld wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sunday, May 04, 2014 09:53:35 AM Peter Humphrey wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Saturday 03 May 2014 23:04:49 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > I spent nearly the whole day digging around this issue ... |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > You did better than I did recently: I spent four days at it. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> For mission-critical systems, I would have done a clean re-install already |
| 9 |
> with data copied back from a backup. More then 24 hours is a deadline. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
That's what I was doing when I discovered the IRQ16 misbehaviour. After that |
| 12 |
it was a matter of finding the cause. As it happens, it went away again by |
| 13 |
itself. Makes me wonder how much more life to expect from this motherboard. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
--->8 |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> I used to have a howto bookmarked that gave more detail then the current |
| 18 |
> step- by-step examples. Unfortunately, that whole website disappeared about |
| 19 |
> 5 or 6 years ago. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Maybe check the old thread where Dale started with LVM. There is a lot of |
| 22 |
> detail in there. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Hmm...don't remember that. I'll see if I can find it - thanks. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
--->8 |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
> > As far as I know, the only thing that /requires/ an initramfs is having a |
| 29 |
> > separate /usr. And I can't help you with GPT or UEFI - sorry. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> A seperate " /usr " or " / " on LVM. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Oh yes, of course. I missed that one. I shouldn't have, because that's the |
| 34 |
reason my / is on RAID-1 but not LVM - to avoid needing an initramfs. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
Regards |
| 38 |
Peter |
Archives