Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 50-51% and emerge metadata timings
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:47:01
Message-Id: 20051228163349.6aea5cc8@snowdrop.home
1 On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 11:22:07 -0500 Jerry McBride
2 <mcbrides9@×××××××.net> wrote:
3 | All the gentoo systems that I admin show the same slow down at about
4 | 51%. I dearly wish we'd get away from a file based database. And
5 | before everyone jumps on me about the various database backend
6 | patches that I can apply to get what I cry for... I've tried them...
7 | None of them put "all the data" into a real database... A shame
8 | too....
9
10 Wrong solution. You do realise that the "updating Portage cache" thing
11 is due to a Portage deficiency, and that the real cache is centrally
12 generated, right?
13
14 --
15 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain)
16 Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org
17 Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 50-51% and emerge metadata timings Jerry McBride <mcbrides9@×××××××.net>