1 |
On Thursday 14 February 2008, Dale wrote: |
2 |
> I did a little test. Something fishy here. I did a test with the |
3 |
> /data partition. I store pictures and documents there and it was |
4 |
> fragmented. I cp -av to another reiserfs formatted partition then |
5 |
> remade the file system and copied it back using basically the same |
6 |
> command just in reverse. This is what I got now: |
7 |
> |
8 |
> root@smoker / # /root/fragck.pl /data/ |
9 |
> 3.88457269700333% non contiguous files, 1.04344379261138 average |
10 |
> fragments. root@smoker / # |
11 |
> |
12 |
> That is not a lot better than it was before. It was 4.6% before. |
13 |
> How is that? I copied it over then ran the command right after |
14 |
> without even touching the files. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Any ideas? Is there a limit to the fragmenting "smallness"? |
17 |
|
18 |
Don't worry about fragmentation on reiserfs. This is not a valid concept |
19 |
for reiser or for ext2/3. |
20 |
|
21 |
Fragmentation is problematic on Windows machines because that code is |
22 |
brain dead. Some people seem to assume that it must therefore be |
23 |
problematic on all file systems. Reiserfs is not brain dead, it is |
24 |
intelligent and will balance itself out over time. It also has tail |
25 |
packing which can make fragmentation stats look odd if enabled. |
26 |
|
27 |
Short answer: |
28 |
|
29 |
Don't worry about it. Let reiserfs do what it wants to do when it wants |
30 |
to do it - it is much much much better at these decisions than you will |
31 |
ever be ;-) |
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
Alan McKinnon |
35 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |