| 1 |
On Thursday 29 July 2010 17:19:09 Tomas Krasnican wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> I haven't see any reason to run mysql server localy, when all of |
| 4 |
> applications are using external box as the database server. So, I |
| 5 |
> looking for the another solution of this "problem". |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
As Alan said, installing the server doesn't cost a lot, especially |
| 8 |
compared with the personal cost of finding a way to exclude it while |
| 9 |
still keeping the client. And as long as you don't add mysqld to any run |
| 10 |
level, it doesn't consume any CPU cycles: it just sits there on your |
| 11 |
disk being ignored. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
You were right to put "problem" in quotation marks. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Rgds |
| 17 |
Peter. Linux Counter 5290, 1994-04-23. |
Archives