| 1 |
Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>>> Le 20 décembre à 15:12 Allan Gottlieb a écrit |
| 4 |
>>> |
| 5 |
>>>> Something seems wrong. |
| 6 |
>>>> Yesterday depclean removed hal and then xdm wouldn't run. |
| 7 |
>>>> Re-merging hal (with -1) fixed this, but again today depclean wants to |
| 8 |
>>>> remove it. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I'm running amd64 here but xdm doesn't show it needing hal here. It's |
| 11 |
> not even in the USE flags and I did a emerge -epv xdm and it still |
| 12 |
> didn't show it. It did pull in policykit tho. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Could it be that it doesn't use hal anymore and you need to figure out |
| 15 |
> what it is using? I know hal is going away but I haven't read that it |
| 16 |
> already was. That said, I did notice that policykit was pulled in |
| 17 |
> yesterday. Of course, xdm doesn't show it needs it either. Could it |
| 18 |
> be udev? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
To summarize |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
1. All is running fine but. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
2. deplcean wants to remove hal and when it does xdm will not run. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
3. I have run emerge world with --newuse, and have run revdep-rebuild, |
| 27 |
and have remerged xdm. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
4. Currently I just refuse depclean's offer to remove hal, halinfo, and |
| 30 |
dmidecode. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
My plan is to stay like this until xorg 1.9 hits ~amd64 since I believe |
| 33 |
at that time hal is going away and hence xdm won't need it. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Does this sound reasonable? |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
allan |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
PS Why is no one else having this problem? |
Archives