| 1 |
Am Mittwoch, 26. Juni 2019, 15:05:27 CEST schrieb Helmut Jarausch: |
| 2 |
> Hi, |
| 3 |
> what is the relationship of a virtual package and eselect. |
| 4 |
> E.g. |
| 5 |
> I have installed openblas but 'eselect blas list' doesn't know about |
| 6 |
> this. |
| 7 |
> I have even modified virtual/blas to include openblas. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I have the feeling you're mixing ::science and ::gentoo packages. Since |
| 10 |
openblas is only in the ::science overlay, I presume you are using that. The |
| 11 |
version of virtual/blas in ::science *does* include openblas already, so you |
| 12 |
shouldn't have needed to modify it, and you should be using eselect::science, |
| 13 |
too. eselect-blas is *not* enough (and I don't even have it installed). |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
If you want to be sure to use packages from ::science, append "::science" to |
| 16 |
packages in your world file or set definition(s). |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> How does eselect get the list of alternatives? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I don't know, sorry. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
> Many thanks for a hint, |
| 23 |
> Helmut |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
BTW, the thread Dale mentioned is part of an effort to get the BLAS/LAPACK |
| 26 |
alternatives handling done properly (or at least more robustly). The way it's |
| 27 |
handled in the ::science overlay currently will likely not be merged into the |
| 28 |
main portage tree. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
HTH |
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Marc Joliet |
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
"People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we |
| 35 |
don't" - Bjarne Stroustrup |
Archives