| 1 |
On 21 September 2010 00:23, Beau Henderson <beau@××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 09/19/10 20:02, András Csányi wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> On 19 September 2010 10:09, Alan McKinnon<alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
>>> |
| 6 |
>>> Apparently, though unproven, at 00:28 on Sunday 19 September 2010, András |
| 7 |
>>> Csányi did opine thusly: |
| 8 |
>>> |
| 9 |
>>>> On 19 September 2010 00:14, Kevin O'Gorman<kogorman@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 10 |
>>>>> |
| 11 |
>>>>> Is it just me? Or does Firefox get slower every release? And less |
| 12 |
>>>>> stable. |
| 13 |
>>>>> |
| 14 |
>>>>> I got myself up to the latest, and I cannot install my 4 add-ons |
| 15 |
>>>>> (xmarks, |
| 16 |
>>>>> AdBlockPlus, Noscript, Stumble-upon) without it crashing. Seg fault |
| 17 |
>>>>> sometimes. I've got ECC memory, and no reported problems, and it does |
| 18 |
>>>>> not help to clear the profiles (rename ~/.mozilla) and re-emerge. |
| 19 |
>>>>> Grrrrrr. |
| 20 |
>>>> |
| 21 |
>>>> Use Chrome/Chromium. At my gentoo the fox won't even start. I don't |
| 22 |
>>>> know why, I won't to know why... I'm tired about Firefox. :S |
| 23 |
>>> |
| 24 |
>>> |
| 25 |
>>> If you run Firefox from a terminal, do you get an error about xpcom? |
| 26 |
>>> |
| 27 |
>>> If so, you need revdep-rebuild and possibly re-merge nss. |
| 28 |
>>> It's all in the build elogs. |
| 29 |
>> |
| 30 |
>> Hi Alan, |
| 31 |
>> |
| 32 |
>> I have tried to start from terminal, but no message. I have tried to |
| 33 |
>> run after revdep-rebuild but nothing. I have installed binary version |
| 34 |
>> but the result was the same. |
| 35 |
>> After these I have tried strace and if I remenber correctly it stopped |
| 36 |
>> with segmentation fault. Unfortunately I can't reproduce this problem |
| 37 |
>> because few days ago I changed my system from 32 bit to 64 bit. Here |
| 38 |
>> everything is working fine according firefox. |
| 39 |
>> |
| 40 |
>> I know I should have report it but, that time, I was really tired |
| 41 |
>> emotionally. :( |
| 42 |
>> |
| 43 |
> |
| 44 |
> I had this same problem and decided I had bad RAM. Before I could order any, |
| 45 |
> I rebuild my system and it happens that I did so with an image that had GCC |
| 46 |
> 4.3* rather than 4.4. Funny enough, firefox worked just fine. I did some |
| 47 |
> searching and apparently nspr has issues with a certain function enabled in |
| 48 |
> -O2 @ gcc 4.4. |
| 49 |
> |
| 50 |
> From the following: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487844 |
| 51 |
> |
| 52 |
> Apparently if you rebuild nspr @ gcc 4.4 with -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing |
| 53 |
> |
| 54 |
> I haven't confirmed this, as I haven't had time to jump back to 4.4 but if |
| 55 |
> someone can confirm this fixes the issue, I'd certainly be greatful! |
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
Hmmm... My former system was compiled with -O3 and gcc version was the |
| 58 |
highest because I always use unstable system. |
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
-- |
| 61 |
- - |
| 62 |
-- Csanyi Andras (Sayusi Ando) -- http://sayusi.hu -- |
| 63 |
http://facebook.com/andras.csanyi |
| 64 |
-- ""Trust in God and keep your gunpowder dry!" - Cromwell |
Archives